Forum
Important Notice for New User Registrations
To combat an increasing number of spam and bot registrations, we now manually approve all new user registrations. While this may cause a delay until your account is approved, this step is essential to ensure the quality and security of this forum.
To help us verify your registration as legitimate, please use a clear name as user name or an official email address (such as a work, university, or similar address). If you’re concerned that we may not recognize your registration as non-spam, feel free to email us at with a request to approve your username.
Free rotation of a vertical axis wind turbine
Quote from AsIlll on 30. April 2025, 14:40Hi,
I am trying to simulate a vertical axis wind turbine. There is no control script added here. When I try to set the rotation to free rotation, I observe that the rotational speed of the vertical axis wind turbine finally stabilizes at a value, and the acceleration in the rotation direction is near zero. However, at this time, the TSR of the turbine is stable at 3.5, and the aerodynamic torque is positive. What puzzles me is that the rotational freedom of the turbine should only have one end subject to positive aerodynamic torque, which should make it always have an acceleration and continue to accelerate. How is it balanced? Thanks if someone can answer my doubts.
Regards, AsIlll
Hi,
I am trying to simulate a vertical axis wind turbine. There is no control script added here. When I try to set the rotation to free rotation, I observe that the rotational speed of the vertical axis wind turbine finally stabilizes at a value, and the acceleration in the rotation direction is near zero. However, at this time, the TSR of the turbine is stable at 3.5, and the aerodynamic torque is positive. What puzzles me is that the rotational freedom of the turbine should only have one end subject to positive aerodynamic torque, which should make it always have an acceleration and continue to accelerate. How is it balanced? Thanks if someone can answer my doubts.
Regards, AsIlll
Uploaded files:- You need to login to have access to uploads.

Quote from David on 30. April 2025, 17:37Hi AsIlll,
the torque and power values shown in the “Aerodynamic Time Graph” aren’t suitable for this analysis since they’re computed by reprojecting aerodynamic panel forces around the rotor axis. This approach does not consider structural inertia or elasticity forces and is only valid for a massless, rigid structure.
For representative results, you should instead use the data from the “Structural Time Graph.” Specifically, the “Aero. LSS Torque [Nm]” variable provides the actual torque measured at the hub and thus represents the appropriate metric for your needs.
BR,
David
Hi AsIlll,
the torque and power values shown in the “Aerodynamic Time Graph” aren’t suitable for this analysis since they’re computed by reprojecting aerodynamic panel forces around the rotor axis. This approach does not consider structural inertia or elasticity forces and is only valid for a massless, rigid structure.
For representative results, you should instead use the data from the “Structural Time Graph.” Specifically, the “Aero. LSS Torque [Nm]” variable provides the actual torque measured at the hub and thus represents the appropriate metric for your needs.
BR,
David
