Forum
Important Notice for New User Registrations
To combat an increasing number of spam and bot registrations, we now manually approve all new user registrations. While this may cause a delay until your account is approved, this step is essential to ensure the quality and security of this forum.
To help us verify your registration as legitimate, please use a clear name as user name or an official email address (such as a work, university, or similar address). If you’re concerned that we may not recognize your registration as non-spam, feel free to email us at with a request to approve your username.
Importing stl file to Blender
Quote from Fabian Chiwi on 1. October 2024, 19:42Hello,
Im at the moment doing a school proyect, and I’m having some trouble with exportating the 3D geometry to an stl file. When I import the stl file in Blender, a free modelling software, the edge of one side doesn´t look closed and there is a gap all along that side. I´m trying to build an wind turbine, and I can´t print the blades like that with the 3d printer. Is there any solution to this?
And also, is there any way of exporting the whole rotor? It’s just, that by exporting only one blade, I loose the optimiced starting grades from the hub.
If anyone could help me with these problems, I’d really apreciate it.
Fabian
Hello,
Im at the moment doing a school proyect, and I’m having some trouble with exportating the 3D geometry to an stl file. When I import the stl file in Blender, a free modelling software, the edge of one side doesn´t look closed and there is a gap all along that side. I´m trying to build an wind turbine, and I can´t print the blades like that with the 3d printer. Is there any solution to this?
And also, is there any way of exporting the whole rotor? It’s just, that by exporting only one blade, I loose the optimiced starting grades from the hub.
If anyone could help me with these problems, I’d really apreciate it.
Fabian
Quote from David on 2. October 2024, 11:56Hello Fabian,
the exported blade geometry in the .stl file should be correct and should not contain any gaps. The attached image shows an exported .stl file from QBlade, confirming that the geometry is closed at both the trailing edge and at the blade ends (the blue lines are the surface normals).
I also know of many users who have used QBlade in the past to 3d print blades through the .stl file export functionality without any issues.
Maybe you can try to use a different geometry viewer or preprocessor?
Also, are you using the latest version of QBlade?
BR,
David
Hello Fabian,
the exported blade geometry in the .stl file should be correct and should not contain any gaps. The attached image shows an exported .stl file from QBlade, confirming that the geometry is closed at both the trailing edge and at the blade ends (the blue lines are the surface normals).
I also know of many users who have used QBlade in the past to 3d print blades through the .stl file export functionality without any issues.
Maybe you can try to use a different geometry viewer or preprocessor?
Also, are you using the latest version of QBlade?
BR,
David
Uploaded files:- You need to login to have access to uploads.
Quote from Fabian Chiwi on 31. October 2024, 13:45Hello David,
Thank you for the help. Turns out I wasn´t using the latest version, so with the current version it works fine.
I got another question. When you optimize your blade design, you can choose for your Opt Chord between Schmitz and Betz. Which one do you recomend for a small scale wind turbine? And also why?
I’d really appreciate your help
Thanks
Fabian
Hello David,
Thank you for the help. Turns out I wasn´t using the latest version, so with the current version it works fine.
I got another question. When you optimize your blade design, you can choose for your Opt Chord between Schmitz and Betz. Which one do you recomend for a small scale wind turbine? And also why?
I’d really appreciate your help
Thanks
Fabian
Quote from David on 1. November 2024, 16:11Hi Fabian,
the Schmitz optimization method also accounts for losses due to swirl (wake rotation) and is therefore the preferred approach.
BR,
David
Hi Fabian,
the Schmitz optimization method also accounts for losses due to swirl (wake rotation) and is therefore the preferred approach.
BR,
David