Forum
Important Notice for New User Registrations
To combat an increasing number of spam and bot registrations, we now manually approve all new user registrations. While this may cause a delay until your account is approved, this step is essential to ensure the quality and security of this forum.
To help us verify your registration as legitimate, please use a clear name as user name or an official email address (such as a work, university, or similar address). If you’re concerned that we may not recognize your registration as non-spam, feel free to email us at with a request to approve your username.
Prandtl Tip Loss Factor
Quote from sun on 31. March 2023, 10:54Hello, Dr. David, I would like to ask if the Prandtl Tip Loss Factor has taken into account the Glauert correction for the QBlade software when the axial induction factor a is greater than 0.2, as shown in the picture.
Hello, Dr. David, I would like to ask if the Prandtl Tip Loss Factor has taken into account the Glauert correction for the QBlade software when the axial induction factor a is greater than 0.2, as shown in the picture.
Uploaded files:- You need to login to have access to uploads.
Quote from David on 31. March 2023, 17:18Hi Sun,
we use a slightly diffeerent formulation in our BEM implementation. The Glauert correction is active based on a check of the thrust, also our correction looks slightly different. Check out the source code, where the BEM is located in the function:
QTurbineSimulationData::steadyStateBEMIteration()in the file:
QTurbineSimulationData.cppBR,
David
Hi Sun,
we use a slightly diffeerent formulation in our BEM implementation. The Glauert correction is active based on a check of the thrust, also our correction looks slightly different. Check out the source code, where the BEM is located in the function:
QTurbineSimulationData::steadyStateBEMIteration()
in the file:
QTurbineSimulationData.cpp
BR,
David