Forum
Important Notice for New User Registrations
To combat an increasing number of spam and bot registrations, we now manually approve all new user registrations. While this may cause a delay until your account is approved, this step is essential to ensure the quality and security of this forum.
To help us verify your registration as legitimate, please use a clear name as user name or an official email address (such as a work, university, or similar address). If you’re concerned that we may not recognize your registration as non-spam, feel free to email us at with a request to approve your username.
Troposkien vs Straight VAWT – RPM vs TSR
Quote from Shubham on 20. September 2023, 18:05Hello,
I am simulating a straight-bladed VAWT at TSR = 3.3, with D = 1.03 and blade span = 1.5m. Then I create a troposkien-shaped VAWT keeping the same swept area. The overall height of VAWT decreases and diameter increases (> 1.03m) at the equator, to create the troposkien shape. But for the same TSR = 3.3, RPM of straight-bladed is 550 and of troposkien-shaped is 366. How does QBlade calculate this number 366? Does it take some equivalent diameter for troposkien which is more than that of straight (that’s why RPM is less for troposkien for same TSR and same freestream velocity)?
Regards
Shubham
Hello,
I am simulating a straight-bladed VAWT at TSR = 3.3, with D = 1.03 and blade span = 1.5m. Then I create a troposkien-shaped VAWT keeping the same swept area. The overall height of VAWT decreases and diameter increases (> 1.03m) at the equator, to create the troposkien shape. But for the same TSR = 3.3, RPM of straight-bladed is 550 and of troposkien-shaped is 366. How does QBlade calculate this number 366? Does it take some equivalent diameter for troposkien which is more than that of straight (that’s why RPM is less for troposkien for same TSR and same freestream velocity)?
Regards
Shubham