Forum
Important Notice for New User Registrations
To combat an increasing number of spam and bot registrations, we now manually approve all new user registrations. While this may cause a delay until your account is approved, this step is essential to ensure the quality and security of this forum.
To help us verify your registration as legitimate, please use a clear name as user name or an official email address (such as a work, university, or similar address). If you’re concerned that we may not recognize your registration as non-spam, feel free to email us at with a request to approve your username.
VAWT power lower than expected
Quote from Jess1123 on 24. February 2025, 11:13Hi
I’m generating a VAWT with an airfoil NACA4418, and the power I’m getting in the multi-DMS section is lower than I calculated it would be. The swept area of the turbine is o.21m^2, and I’ve attached a screenshot of all the other input parameters. From using the max power available equation, I thought the max power for 200 RPM should be about 10.29W, but I’m getting a max of just under 2W. I’m unsure what I’m doing wrong and was wondering if there were any suggestions on how to fix this?
thanks
Jess
Hi
I’m generating a VAWT with an airfoil NACA4418, and the power I’m getting in the multi-DMS section is lower than I calculated it would be. The swept area of the turbine is o.21m^2, and I’ve attached a screenshot of all the other input parameters. From using the max power available equation, I thought the max power for 200 RPM should be about 10.29W, but I’m getting a max of just under 2W. I’m unsure what I’m doing wrong and was wondering if there were any suggestions on how to fix this?
thanks
Jess
Uploaded files:
- You need to login to have access to uploads.

Quote from David on 24. February 2025, 14:12Hello Jess,
could the discrepancy be due to your simulation using a fixed pitch angle of 15°?
Other than I cannot tell whats causing the difference.
On a general note, the DMST algorithm is quite unreliable for predicting VAWT performance. I strongly recommend using the LLFVW method in the time domain to ensure consistent results. You may find some relevant discussions on the DMST algorithm in the forum posts linked below:
https://qblade.org/qblade-forum/search/?keywords=DMST
BR,
David
Hello Jess,
could the discrepancy be due to your simulation using a fixed pitch angle of 15°?
Other than I cannot tell whats causing the difference.
On a general note, the DMST algorithm is quite unreliable for predicting VAWT performance. I strongly recommend using the LLFVW method in the time domain to ensure consistent results. You may find some relevant discussions on the DMST algorithm in the forum posts linked below:
https://qblade.org/qblade-forum/search/?keywords=DMST
BR,
David
