Forum
Important Notice for New User Registrations
To combat an increasing number of spam and bot registrations, we now manually approve all new user registrations. While this may cause a delay until your account is approved, this step is essential to ensure the quality and security of this forum.
To help us verify your registration as legitimate, please use a clear name as user name or an official email address (such as a work, university, or similar address). If you’re concerned that we may not recognize your registration as non-spam, feel free to email us at with a request to approve your username.
Mooring Lines
Quote from Camelia on 5. June 2025, 16:31Hello, David,when performing the calculation, the clump weights are located along the touchdown portion of the mooring lines. However, in the software, it appears that the *ADDMASS* setting assigns the entire mass to the platform rather than to the mooring lines. How can this issue be resolved?
Hello, David,when performing the calculation, the clump weights are located along the touchdown portion of the mooring lines. However, in the software, it appears that the *ADDMASS* setting assigns the entire mass to the platform rather than to the mooring lines. How can this issue be resolved?

Quote from David on 5. June 2025, 20:34Hi Camelia,
the ADDMASS keyword cann add mass and inertia properties to a substructure joint:
For example: ADDMASS_5 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 adds a mass of 10kg at the joint with ID 5. The following numbers assign the rotational inertia in local joint coordinates: Ixx = 1, Iyy = 2, Izz = 3, Ixy = 4, Ixz = 5, Iyz = 6.
BR,
David
Hi Camelia,
the ADDMASS keyword cann add mass and inertia properties to a substructure joint:
For example: ADDMASS_5 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 adds a mass of 10kg at the joint with ID 5. The following numbers assign the rotational inertia in local joint coordinates: Ixx = 1, Iyy = 2, Izz = 3, Ixy = 4, Ixz = 5, Iyz = 6.
BR,
David
Quote from Camelia on 6. June 2025, 04:42Hello David,
Thank you for your reply. We are aware of how to use the ADDMASS setting. However, I have noticed an issue: the added mass specified using ADDMASS is being counted as part of the Substructure mass, rather than as part of the Mooring mass. Could you please advise on how to resolve this issue?
Best regards,
Camelia
Hello David,
Thank you for your reply. We are aware of how to use the ADDMASS setting. However, I have noticed an issue: the added mass specified using ADDMASS is being counted as part of the Substructure mass, rather than as part of the Mooring mass. Could you please advise on how to resolve this issue?
Best regards,
Camelia
- You need to login to have access to uploads.

Quote from David on 6. June 2025, 12:54Hi,
I understand your point now.
Indeed, the information dialog attributes all contributions from ADDMASS to the substructure mass. However, please note that the values shown in this dialog are only intended to provide an overview of the mass contributions – they are not used directly in the structural dynamics simulation. In the actual simulation, the additional mass assigned to the nodes is correctly applied, even if it is listed as part of the substructure in the overview.
To obtain a more accurate lumped mass distribution than shown in this overview, you can manually subtract these ADDMASS contributions from the substructure mass and reassign them to the mooring mass. Unfortunately, it is difficult to automatically determine whether a substructure joint should be classified as part of the mooring system or the substructure. As a result, all joint mass contributions are grouped under the total substructure mass in the overview.
Best regards,
David
Hi,
I understand your point now.
Indeed, the information dialog attributes all contributions from ADDMASS to the substructure mass. However, please note that the values shown in this dialog are only intended to provide an overview of the mass contributions – they are not used directly in the structural dynamics simulation. In the actual simulation, the additional mass assigned to the nodes is correctly applied, even if it is listed as part of the substructure in the overview.
To obtain a more accurate lumped mass distribution than shown in this overview, you can manually subtract these ADDMASS contributions from the substructure mass and reassign them to the mooring mass. Unfortunately, it is difficult to automatically determine whether a substructure joint should be classified as part of the mooring system or the substructure. As a result, all joint mass contributions are grouped under the total substructure mass in the overview.
Best regards,
David
