Forum
Important Notice for New User Registrations
To combat an increasing number of spam and bot registrations, we now manually approve all new user registrations. While this may cause a delay until your account is approved, this step is essential to ensure the quality and security of this forum.
To help us verify your registration as legitimate, please use a clear name as user name or an official email address (such as a work, university, or similar address). If you’re concerned that we may not recognize your registration as non-spam, feel free to email us at with a request to approve your username.
Virtual Camber Transformation
Quote from selvarajooSR on 16. August 2022, 11:56Hi Dr. Marten,
Congratulations on the new release of QBlade!
I’m currently working on self-starting Darrieus turbines modelling entirely in QBlade, we are close to wrapping up the work and publishing. With the release of QBlade 2.0, I’m attempting to rerun the simulations with the virtual camber effect to get better results.
However, when I attempt to transform the airfoil, it does not matter what c/r ratio or TSR input, the virtual camber transformation is always the same for a NACA0018 airfoil.
The uploaded image is an example of three attempts to apply virtual camber, all with varying parameters of TSR (1, 1, 4) and c/r(0.2, 0.5, 0.1) respectively, but they are all overlapping each other.
However, different airfoils have different virtual camber transformations. I’m guessing this is a bug? Since the VC transformation should change with the input parameters
Hi Dr. Marten,
Congratulations on the new release of QBlade!
I’m currently working on self-starting Darrieus turbines modelling entirely in QBlade, we are close to wrapping up the work and publishing. With the release of QBlade 2.0, I’m attempting to rerun the simulations with the virtual camber effect to get better results.
However, when I attempt to transform the airfoil, it does not matter what c/r ratio or TSR input, the virtual camber transformation is always the same for a NACA0018 airfoil.
The uploaded image is an example of three attempts to apply virtual camber, all with varying parameters of TSR (1, 1, 4) and c/r(0.2, 0.5, 0.1) respectively, but they are all overlapping each other.
However, different airfoils have different virtual camber transformations. I’m guessing this is a bug? Since the VC transformation should change with the input parameters
Uploaded files:- You need to login to have access to uploads.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0abcc/0abccc0fba58403150478d6536f68cf8bdec4bf4" alt=""
Quote from David on 16. August 2022, 20:10Hi,
thanks for reporting this – you shall be awared with the “first bug reported” badge 🙂
Indeed the behavior is as you observed – the reason being that the default values (TSR 4 and c/r 0.1) were read from the dialog and not the updated user inputs. I fixed this and reuploaded the bugfix.
Best,
David
Hi,
thanks for reporting this – you shall be awared with the “first bug reported” badge 🙂
Indeed the behavior is as you observed – the reason being that the default values (TSR 4 and c/r 0.1) were read from the dialog and not the updated user inputs. I fixed this and reuploaded the bugfix.
Best,
David
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9013/b9013886c328b65e0b7d13893cfeb7c1a90ca72e" alt=""